Skip to main content

IESBA Fees Questionnaire

IESBA Seeks Your View about the Level of Fees Charged by Audit Firms
IESBA
| Exposure Drafts and Consultation Papers
English
Comments due by:

Update: The IESBA has extended their deadline to March 1, 2018 to give stakeholders an extra month to respond to their Fees Questionnaire. 

The IESBA is exploring a number of matters related to fees charged by firms with a view to determining whether there is a need for further enhancements to the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants or the commissioning of staff guidance. As part of its fact finding, the IESBA is releasing a survey questionnaire to seek views and information from stakeholders (investors and other users of financial statements, the corporate governance community, the regulatory and audit oversight community, preparers, firms, national standard setters, IFAC member bodies, academics and others). The responses will help inform the IESBA’s consideration of the relevant matters.

 

PLEASE NOTE: Our system requires both a PDF and Word document when submitting a response online. If you are experiencing difficulty in submitting your completed questionnaire online, please forward it directly to GeoffKwan@ethicsboard.org or KenSiong@ethicsboard.org.  

Image
IESBA Seeks Your View about the Level of Fees Charged by Audit Firms
Copyright © 2024 The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). All rights reserved.

Submitted Comment Letters

  1. Radiah Othman (978.04 KB)
     ()
  2.  (Romania)
  3.  (India)
  4. M J RAIYANI AND CO. (907.11 KB)
     (India)
  5. Auckland Council (979.52 KB)
     ()
  6. SFAI (979.59 KB)
     ()
  7. RSM International (1003.4 KB)
     ()
  8. Tarina Els (1.68 MB)
     ()
  9. IECnet (979.27 KB)
     (Spain)
  10.  (Germany)
  11. Gaylen Hansen (1019.91 KB)
     (United States of America)
  12. IBR-IRE (988.14 KB)
     ()
  13.  ()
  14. Ebner Stolz (76.83 KB)
     (Germany)
  15.  ()
  16.  (India)
  17. Alice McCleary (1019 KB)
     ()
  18.  (Germany)
  19.  ()
  20.  (Iran)
  21.  ()
  22.  ()
  23.  ()
  24.  (United Kingdom)
  25. Jean Pretorius CA (975.31 KB)
     (South Africa)
  26. Lund & Kieck Inc (1.45 MB)
     (South Africa)
  27. MMI Group (1001.88 KB)
     (South Africa)
  28.  (United States of America)
  29. Nexia Friedman (977.81 KB)
     (Canada)
  30.  (Canada)
  31.  (New Zealand)
  32.  (South Africa)
  33. Zeifmans LLP (186.42 KB)
     (Canada)
  34.  (United States of America)
  35. Jane Ndlovu (1021.59 KB)
     (South Africa)
  36. IFAC SMP Committee (197.13 KB)
     ()
  37.  (Madagascar)
  38. Rymand & Co (1.85 MB)
     (Iran)
  39. Dailamipour & Co (2.42 MB)
     (Iran)
  40.  (Malaysia)
  41. Auren International (1017.21 KB)
     (Spain)
  42.  (Madagascar)
  43. Mario Ranarijesy (1.03 MB)
     (Madagascar)
  44. Sylvia Randrianiriana (1018.19 KB)
     (Madagascar)
  45.  (Australia)
  46.  (Argentina)
  47.  (Colombia)
  48. Baker Tilly Chile (833.55 KB)
     (Chile)
  49. Baker Tilly Venezuela (1015.21 KB)
     (República de Venezuela)
  50.  ()