Skip to main content

Proposed Change to the Definition of "Engagement Team"

IESBA
| Exposure Drafts and Consultation Papers
English
Comments due by:

This Exposure Draft proposes changes to the definition of “engagement team” to make it clear that internal auditors providing direct assistance to an external auditor are not considered to be part of the audit engagement team under the IESBA Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (the Code) and eliminate the perception that the Code and ISA 610, Using the Work of Internal Auditors, are in conflict. See the press release

NOTE: COMMENT PERIOD IS OPEN UNTIL MAY 31, 2012.

Copyright © 2024 The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). All rights reserved.

Submitted Comment Letters

  1. Anonymous (3.58 KB)
     (United States of America)
  2.  (United Kingdom)
  3. ICAEW (290.85 KB)
     (United Kingdom)
  4.  (Uzbekistan)
  5. AICPA (209.43 KB)
     (United States of America)
  6.  (Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China)
  7. CS OEC and CNCC (68.65 KB)
     (France)
  8.  (Italy)
  9.  (Japan)
  10. CGA-Canada (79.22 KB)
     (Canada)
  11.  (United States of America)
  12.  (Australia)
  13.  (Bangladesh)
  14. BDO (21.78 KB)
     (United States of America)
  15.  (United Kingdom)
  16.  (United States of America)
  17.  (Spain)
  18. CPA Australia (34.08 KB)
     (Australia)
  19.  (Korea)
  20.  (Spain)
  21.  (Canada)
  22. FAR (121.41 KB)
     (Sweden)
  23.  (Denmark)
  24.  (Belgium)
  25.  (Singapore)
  26.  (Malaysia)
  27.  (South Africa)
  28.  (Zambia)
  29.  (United Kingdom)
  30.  (United States of America)
  31. KPMG (136.03 KB)
     (United Kingdom)
  32.  (United Kingdom)
  33.  (Ireland)
  34.  (Brazil)
  35.  (Belgium)
  36.  (United States of America)
  37.  (New Zealand)
  38.  (Netherlands)
  39.  (Kenya)
  40. ICAS (211.61 KB)
     (United Kingdom)
  41.  (Germany)
  42.  (China)
  43.  (Australia)
  44.  (Germany)
  45.  (Netherlands)
  46.  (Spain)